Intellectual Property in the Maze of Liquidation and Business Rescue in South Africa

News and Views

Intellectual Property in the Maze of Liquidation and Business Rescue in South Africa 

 

The convergence of insolvency proceedings and intellectual property management necessitates a nuanced understanding of the legal frameworks and operational mechanisms that govern these fields. This article delves into the implications of liquidation and business rescue processes on intellectual property (IP) assets, which are crucial yet often forgotten components of a company’s valuation. As businesses navigate the challenging waters of financial distress, the strategic management of IP can play a pivotal role in determining their future. 

In South Africa, the winding-up of insolvent companies is governed by the Insolvency Act (No. 24 of 1936) and the Old Companies Act (No. 61 of 1973), as per section 79(1)(b) of the New Companies Act (No. 71 of 2008), each setting forth the regulations and procedures for managing insolvency. Liquidation can be initiated either voluntarily through a board resolution or involuntarily through a creditor’s court application. The process requires that all relevant stakeholders, including employees, trade unions, the Master of the High Court of South Africa, and the South African Revenue Services (SARS), be notified, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. 

Contrastingly, business rescue is provided for under the Companies Act as an alternative aimed at restructuring financially distressed companies. This procedure involves placing the company under the management of a business rescue practitioner who devises a plan to either restore the company’s financial health or optimize the return to creditors, all while a moratorium on claims protects the company from creditors’ actions during the restructuring phase. 

IP assets such as patents, trade marks, copyrights, and trade secrets are vital components in liquidation proceedings. These assets must be precisely evaluated and potentially sold to satisfy creditor claims. Such evaluations require a rigorous approach to valuation to ensure these assets do not sell for less than their worth, which is crucial in preventing the undervaluation of key business assets. During liquidation, the handling of IP begins with a thorough inventory, assessing each asset’s registration status, market relevance, and potential for income generation. IP valuation experts often collaborate with industry specialists to gauge the marketability of these assets and propose strategies for their sale or licensing. This might involve auctioning off patents or negotiating the transfer of copyrights and trademarks to interested parties who can continue to exploit these assets commercially. Most notably, ownership of IP assets cannot be transferred after liquidation and, therefore, the IP assets must be dealt with before the conclusion of the liquidation process. 

In addition to the former, IP can maintain or even increase in value during liquidation, particularly in technology-driven industries where proprietary technologies are core to business operations. This dismantles the misconception that IP necessarily depreciates upon the business’s closure. Additionally, careful consideration is given to IP licenses and agreements. Liquidators must decide whether to uphold, renegotiate, or terminate these based on their potential to bring value to the creditors. Any decisions regarding IP must also consider existing legal obligations and the potential for future revenue generation. 

In the context of business rescue, IP assets play a critical role in sustaining business operations and can be pivotal to the restructuring effort. Especially for technology and creative companies, maintaining an active IP portfolio is essential for ongoing operations and can significantly enhance the company’s attractiveness to potential investors or financiers. In such a case, IP serves not only as a tool for operational continuity but also as collateral for securing post-commencement financing, which is often critical to the success of the rescue efforts. 

Strategic decisions regarding whether to retain or sell IP assets must be made based on their ability to contribute to the business’s recovery. This involves analysing each asset’s direct contribution to revenue generation, its cost of maintenance (such as renewal fees for patents, registered designs and trade marks), and its potential to attract strategic partnership(s) or investment(s). The business rescue practitioner plays a key role in these decisions, aiming to balance the immediate financial needs against the long-term benefits of retaining valuable IP. 

Thus, as companies navigate the complexities of liquidation and business rescue, the strategic management of intellectual property (IP) plays a pivotal role in determining their financial outcomes. It is crucial for companies facing these challenges to consult with intellectual property attorneys. These specialists provide essential expertise in evaluating and maximizing the value of IP assets, ensuring legal compliance, and strategically leveraging these assets to benefit the company and its creditors. By engaging intellectual property attorneys, companies can effectively safeguard their interests, optimize their IP portfolio, and enhance their prospects for recovery and financial stability. 

Tim Laurens

Associate

Patents Department
Email TimL@kisch-ip.com
Tel +27 11 324 3107