News and Views
THE IMPORTANCE OF SEMANTICS
“When a witness, particularly one testifying in support of obviousness, uses words such as ‘imaginative’ and ‘creative’, it tends instead to support a conclusion of inventiveness and hence patentability.”
South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal was confronted with an interesting case in Mantella Trading 310 v Kusile Mining, where the disputed issues, outside of the expected ones of patentability and infringement, concerned sufficiency.
The respondent, Kusile, had convinced the lower court that the patent, directed to ventilation systems for mining operations, was liable to revocation on the basis of lack of inventive step. The appeal court agreed.
Kusile raised the following grounds in support of its claim for revocation (brought in reaction to a claim for infringement):
- The claims of the patent were not based on matter disclosed in the patent specification;
- The claims were otherwise unclear; and
- The patent failed to sufficiently describe, ascertain and where necessary illustrate and exemplify the invention and the manner in which it is to be performed, thereby permitting the skilled addressee to perform the invention.
Many of the arguments (including that of inventive step) revolved around the words “rigid material” as used in the specification.
In relation to the grounds for insufficiency, without any specification-based dictionary for the term and also without any special meaning derivable from the industry, the Supreme Court concluded that the phrase must be given its ordinary grammatical meaning.
Three expert witnesses offered testimony. This was done in order to construe the claims purposively, meaning they must not be read in isolation but in the context of the whole of the specification. A court’s understanding of the specification through an expert’s eyes would also answer the ground of lack of clarity.
Meanings that are consistent with that of the overall specification are meanings to be accepted as demonstrative of the intention of the author (and through it the patentee) at the time of drafting. A dictionary having several meanings of a word provides a guide to its interpretation, bearing in mind its context in the specification.
The court described who the skilled addressee is. In summary he or she is someone who is expected to bring reasonable intelligence to bear on the language of the specification, and who, while not required to struggle unduly with it, is to make the best of it and not adopt an attitude of studied obtuseness.
On the basis of expert testimony, the court ruled against the sufficiency arguments.
Infringement was common cause, as the court took account of the fact that the infringing articles bore similar material to the patent claims. Having copied the very feature that was characterised as being insufficient (or insufficiently worded) in the writer’s view probably assisted the court in holding against the sufficiency argument.
Turning now to deal with lack of inventive step, the court noted that the invention was a simple one that brought together known elements in achieving its result. The court held that its very simplicity contributed to its invalidity, and although it cautioned itself against a hindsight argument of invalidity, upheld revocation.
Even though different methods were employed between the cited prior art and the invention subject to present scrutiny, these methods achieved the same effect, which the court saw as a ground confirming revocation. While this appears at face value to be a decision against the existence of the doctrine of equivalents, no explicit argument was raised in this regard.
In dealing with the question of obviousness, the court relied on the well-known test of obviousness, which essentially is represented by four questions, namely to identify the inventive step, to define the state of the art, to identify the differences between the invention and the state of the art, and to quantify such difference with regards to obviousness.
When a witness, particularly one testifying in support of obviousness, uses words such as “imaginative” and “creative”, it tends instead to support a conclusion of inventiveness and hence patentability, irrespective of simplicity. What further assisted the court to maintain its position in favour of inventive step was that the patented article fulfilled a long established need in the field and enjoyed commercial success.
The judgment is a sound one and its reasoning represents a comprehensive list of questions one would have to answer, whether as patentee or applicant, for revocation. It is therefore a recommended read for future or current patent litigants in the South African context.
Publication Name: The importance of semantics
Date: July, 2015
Sorry if that is TMI levitra pour femme
I read this piece of writing fully concerning the comparison of latest and
earlier technologies, it’s amazing article.
This piece of writing is genuinely a good one it assists new the web people, who are wishing for blogging.
Good day! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which
blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because
I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at options for
another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point
me in the direction of a good platform.
Whoa! This blog looks just like my old one!
It’s on a entirely different subject but it has pretty much
the same layout and design. Superb choice of colors!
I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good.
I don’t know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if
you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!
I all the time used to read paragraph in news
papers but now as I am a user of net therefore
from now I am using net for posts, thanks to web.
I pay a quick visit daily a few sites and sites to read articles, however this website provides quality
based posts.
Have you ever considered publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other blogs?
I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would
really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my viewers would value your work.
If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send
me an e mail.
Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
you made blogging look easy. The overall look
of your website is wonderful, as well as the content!
Your means of telling all in this paragraph is really good, all be able to effortlessly
understand it, Thanks a lot.
Paragraph writing is also a fun, if you be familiar with then you
can write if not it is complicated to write.
First of all I would like to say excellent blog!
I had a quick question which I’d like to ask if you do not mind.
I was interested to know how you center yourself and clear your
thoughts before writing. I’ve had a tough time clearing my mind in getting my ideas out there.
I do enjoy writing however it just seems like the first
10 to 15 minutes tend to be wasted just trying to figure out how
to begin. Any suggestions or tips? Cheers!
Spot on with this write-up, I really believe this site needs much more attention. I’ll
probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the information!
Hi to every body, it’s my first pay a visit of this weblog;
this webpage includes amazing and in fact good data in support of visitors.
Hello! I’m at work surfing around your blog from my new apple iphone!
Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all
your posts! Carry on the excellent work!
Hello, Neat post. There’s a problem with your site
in internet explorer, may check this? IE still is the market
chief and a big part of other folks will pass over your wonderful writing because
of this problem.
It’s very effortless to find out any matter on net as compared to
textbooks, as I found this piece of writing at this website.
Touche. Great arguments. Keep up the good spirit.
Hello it’s me, I am also visiting this web site regularly, this web page is actually nice
and the visitors are genuinely sharing nice thoughts.
My spouse and I stumbled over here different website
and thought I should check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you.
Look forward to going over your web page yet again.
Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favourite
reason seemed to be at the web the easiest thing to
have in mind of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while folks think
about issues that they just do not understand about.
You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest as neatly as
defined out the whole thing with no need side-effects , other
people could take a signal. Will probably be again to get more.
Thanks
Good post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I
stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be exciting to read articles from other
writers and practice a little something from other
websites.
Informative article, just what I needed.
Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article.
I will be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your
useful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.